Theoretical Economics 12 (2017), 533–554
Tweet
On the equivalence of large individualized and distributionalized games
Mohammed Ali Khan, Kali P. Rath, Haomiao Yu, Yongchao Zhang
Abstract
The theory of large one-shot simultaneous-play games with a bio-social typology has been presented in both the individualized and distributionalized forms, LIG and LDG respectively. Using an example of an LDG with two actions and a single trait in which some Nash equilibrium distributions cannot be induced by the Nash equilibria of the representing LIG, this paper offers three equivalence results that delineate a relationship between the two game-forms. Our analysis also reveals the different roles that the Lebesgue unit interval and a saturated space play in the theory.
Keywords: Distributionalized games, individualized games, Nash equilibrium distribution, Nash equilibrium, representation, equivalence, weak-equivalence, quasi-equivalence, realization, similarity, symmetry, countability, saturation
JEL classification: C62, D50, D82, G13
Full Text: PRINT VIEW